DEAR JUDGE FLETCHER:
MOTHER ALWAYS HAS WHAT IS
IN EMMA'S BEST INTEREST...
DEAR JUDGE PAMELA FOSTER FLETCHER
We respect your honors position and have the wear with all to know that CPS is a needed dpt., for abused kids. The Routh children do not fit that criteria and profile to render your services. Your own guidelines of mandated laws proven this fact. as well as the lawyers. I’d also would like to call to your attention, but is not limited to, the choices and decisions regarding Emma’s potential healthcare that would be made by the CPS department would lead to a early demise for the child. Her care would be based on treating her, and as Dads choice to draw a line, limited to the 8% at Texas Hospital~making a 0% percent chance of surviving. which would of led to a much earlier demise for the child, had it not been for Emma’s mother, none of you would be here, because there would not be an Emma. I really don’t forsee any of their employees and/or staff members caring so much so for this child that they would extend themselves to go out and do the foot work, as does her mother. Her own father and the paternal family wouldn't, in fact, went so far as to appear at a benefit function Walmart had for the child, and create such a rukus, Walmart security had to call Police officials for assistance to remove her, as she continued pronouncing it to be a "SCAM", TO OBTAIN FUNDS, THAT MEDICARE PAYS FOR! Although the paternal family possess the knowledge that Medicare, nor Gov.t entities, don't pay for everything, for example, but not limited too, Donor testing. They will do the limited at, the 8% care in Texas Hospital~now making a 0% percent chance of surviving. You are not in court because of neglect from Ms. Routh, but that of workers Neglecting to perform the duties as described in their job title/position, and do a thorough investigation, if in the best interest of the child; not just parts.
The fact being when left up Govt. ENTITIES neglecting funds to Caucasians for Donor Testing~Little Miss Emma Routh would not even be here for them to take! But now, feel a need to care, interfere and make decisions, and rule on, what is in her childs Best Interest, further ignorance and negligence of the child's continued on-going medical to sustain the life, she's been so blessed with by her loving mother, with the help of you, and numerous others, would be their deciding that in the child's best interest would be to place the child, in her fragile state of health, into the very hands of those, who also deemed and cared not, to utilize extended medical options to sustain the livelihood of the child, nor do they continue to follow Boston's medical guidelines, as needed for a continued successful Organ Transplant, one would deem, that this is not being in the Best Interest of the Child, Emma Routh. {Which you of all, know of, considering your having to Order them to Do So}
Which, if I may point out, as per Medical Records that Child Protective svce possess, that since the child's return home to Texas in May 2010, and in the mother's sole care, there is no record of medical incidence, at least not until, June 2010, her first weekend visit to her fathers, upon return, led to mother concerned and taking her to the Emergency room. Approx. 3 more future visits, with medical concerns to her childs life, would follow, after visits with father. t On one occasion upon mother picking he child up from a visit, had to call an Ambulance due to the extent of dehydration, lethargy, and rushed her to emergency, resulting in her needing to stay for a length of time. With the fragile child's life on the balance, the concerned and frightened mother ~herself~ called the child protection svce., from the first incident- yet, ALL THOSE REPORTS FELL ON DEAF EARS. {all this info. as per reports by mother to cps; and in med. records, the cps posses and are with knowledge of} So, all is understood, the child during visits with father, led to child requiring hospitalization, due too being so dehydrated,{once required ambulance due to being so lethargic} yet, Child Protective Svcs. deems the best interest of the Child would be out of mothers care {due to alleged dehydration for first time} and placed into the father and paternal families care.
Boston Hospital hadn't called of their alleged concerns immediately, rather than NEARLY a week later, and only after mother having denied further administration of their test drug to the child. The court system has been used and in the worst form, from those who have taken an oath. Furthermore, no one has reported this to the Medical boards, and yet the court rather to further continue with these unlawful injustices to keep the children in CPS custody. This abuse of positions, is with the fore thought, intent, and knowledge that it would be and ONGOING, at the Cost of this Child's life and label it to "being in the child's best interest" speaks for itself of how they feel...
We are aware of, it's been proven, of this further incarceration of the Routh family Unit is being done so, only with the use and abuse by Texas CPS ignorance/neglect of the laws to which they mandate. This so-called CPS Intervention, has been done so, by violating all of this families rights as a U.S. CITIZEN, and the laws that are to be governed. Beginning with, but not limited too~ having taken these children without warrant, evidence of there being need of the departments services, and the on going continued neglect of rights, protected by laws that proceed individuals once placed into service.- It's a matter of record, that her medical needs were best met and proven to be when in the care of Ms. Brandy Routh, her mother, advocate, nurse, and above all,, caring for the best Interest of her children, more than you, or I, the paternal family, the child Protection Svce., and obviously Boston Hospital too..
It also comes with another price, and it's the lives of those individuals really in need of the Child Protection svce.,, that are tying up the time and funds to be in court, pay the foster care providers, just the paper work alone is costly.
THE MOTIVE BEHIND THIS DEPT. of child protective svce. IS THE GOVT. TITLE IV INCENTIVE FUNDS GRANTED THEM, but the conditions for them to receive these bonus funds stipulate that they have to have had increased the number of children from the prior year. THEY ALSO GET SPECIAL PERKS FOR THOSE KIDS THEY ADOPT OUT. With the Routh case, they got a double header: the medicaid funds no longer paid to Boston, would return to Texas; and these INCENTIVE GRANTS, that COME OUT OF OUR SENIOR CITIZENS SOCIAL SECURITY FUND, that's why it's broke/DRAINED. This is going on nationwide, with Florida and Texas in the lead for having raked in the most OF THOSE incentive funds, totaling in the hundreds of millions.
The following are just "some" I'd like to point out of the "on-going", besides the facts that the Routh children have been illegally taken into CPS custody, they continue to:
1. Denial of medical records and information (example-Dalton/Emma appointments, treatments, outcomes, drugs like Clonidine).
2. CPS's demand that Brandy see their contracted counselor even though she has one and will pay for it herself. Multiple violations of CPS policies and ethics laws.
3. Denial of either Family Team Meeting (before removal) and Family Group Conference (after removal).
4. Visitations are in a hostile environment and too infrequent for such a young child (Dalton) and for a medically fragile child (Emma) because of the stress the separation is causing especially relating to Emma's recovery.
5. Homeschooling was vehemently attacked by DFPS and now that Emma is in public school she's being exposed to a host germ. Furthermore, Dalton has NOT received his speech therapies that the mother Brandy was performing with both at home. {Might it be noted the child Dalton is #3 yrs. of age-technically ,he's not even met legal school age requirements. How could she be penalized for something she's not even required, by law, to do yet}..
6. EMMA'S MEDICAL CONDITION!! Most important and paramount. Emma is probably rejecting her transplant at least in part due to the cessation of all the sterile precautions. CPS denied this information to the mother and (even to the judge). The caregiver also informed Brandy that Amy was no longer giving Emma the anti-rejection drugs. Mother has no way of knowing (since she's denied medical records) who is making the call and why. EMMA COULD DIE AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THIS PROTECTION INTERVENTION (removal) and the department's lack of following even the most basic policies and procedures that codified in the law.
^^There is also the on-going violations of rights, that the dept. of CPS has continued abuse of making decisions, without the Judges knowledge, of meetings, and decisions being made, without approval by Judge; not permitting the lawyers to attend or be informed of those meetings, nor decisions that were made regarding the children.^^
Respectfully,
U.S. CITIZENS OF AMERICA
We respect your honors position and have the wear with all to know that CPS is a needed dpt., for abused kids. The Routh children do not fit that criteria and profile to render your services. Your own guidelines of mandated laws proven this fact. as well as the lawyers. I’d also would like to call to your attention, but is not limited to, the choices and decisions regarding Emma’s potential healthcare that would be made by the CPS department would lead to a early demise for the child. Her care would be based on treating her, and as Dads choice to draw a line, limited to the 8% at Texas Hospital~making a 0% percent chance of surviving. which would of led to a much earlier demise for the child, had it not been for Emma’s mother, none of you would be here, because there would not be an Emma. I really don’t forsee any of their employees and/or staff members caring so much so for this child that they would extend themselves to go out and do the foot work, as does her mother. Her own father and the paternal family wouldn't, in fact, went so far as to appear at a benefit function Walmart had for the child, and create such a rukus, Walmart security had to call Police officials for assistance to remove her, as she continued pronouncing it to be a "SCAM", TO OBTAIN FUNDS, THAT MEDICARE PAYS FOR! Although the paternal family possess the knowledge that Medicare, nor Gov.t entities, don't pay for everything, for example, but not limited too, Donor testing. They will do the limited at, the 8% care in Texas Hospital~now making a 0% percent chance of surviving. You are not in court because of neglect from Ms. Routh, but that of workers Neglecting to perform the duties as described in their job title/position, and do a thorough investigation, if in the best interest of the child; not just parts.
The fact being when left up Govt. ENTITIES neglecting funds to Caucasians for Donor Testing~Little Miss Emma Routh would not even be here for them to take! But now, feel a need to care, interfere and make decisions, and rule on, what is in her childs Best Interest, further ignorance and negligence of the child's continued on-going medical to sustain the life, she's been so blessed with by her loving mother, with the help of you, and numerous others, would be their deciding that in the child's best interest would be to place the child, in her fragile state of health, into the very hands of those, who also deemed and cared not, to utilize extended medical options to sustain the livelihood of the child, nor do they continue to follow Boston's medical guidelines, as needed for a continued successful Organ Transplant, one would deem, that this is not being in the Best Interest of the Child, Emma Routh. {Which you of all, know of, considering your having to Order them to Do So}
Which, if I may point out, as per Medical Records that Child Protective svce possess, that since the child's return home to Texas in May 2010, and in the mother's sole care, there is no record of medical incidence, at least not until, June 2010, her first weekend visit to her fathers, upon return, led to mother concerned and taking her to the Emergency room. Approx. 3 more future visits, with medical concerns to her childs life, would follow, after visits with father. t On one occasion upon mother picking he child up from a visit, had to call an Ambulance due to the extent of dehydration, lethargy, and rushed her to emergency, resulting in her needing to stay for a length of time. With the fragile child's life on the balance, the concerned and frightened mother ~herself~ called the child protection svce., from the first incident- yet, ALL THOSE REPORTS FELL ON DEAF EARS. {all this info. as per reports by mother to cps; and in med. records, the cps posses and are with knowledge of} So, all is understood, the child during visits with father, led to child requiring hospitalization, due too being so dehydrated,{once required ambulance due to being so lethargic} yet, Child Protective Svcs. deems the best interest of the Child would be out of mothers care {due to alleged dehydration for first time} and placed into the father and paternal families care.
Boston Hospital hadn't called of their alleged concerns immediately, rather than NEARLY a week later, and only after mother having denied further administration of their test drug to the child. The court system has been used and in the worst form, from those who have taken an oath. Furthermore, no one has reported this to the Medical boards, and yet the court rather to further continue with these unlawful injustices to keep the children in CPS custody. This abuse of positions, is with the fore thought, intent, and knowledge that it would be and ONGOING, at the Cost of this Child's life and label it to "being in the child's best interest" speaks for itself of how they feel...
We are aware of, it's been proven, of this further incarceration of the Routh family Unit is being done so, only with the use and abuse by Texas CPS ignorance/neglect of the laws to which they mandate. This so-called CPS Intervention, has been done so, by violating all of this families rights as a U.S. CITIZEN, and the laws that are to be governed. Beginning with, but not limited too~ having taken these children without warrant, evidence of there being need of the departments services, and the on going continued neglect of rights, protected by laws that proceed individuals once placed into service.- It's a matter of record, that her medical needs were best met and proven to be when in the care of Ms. Brandy Routh, her mother, advocate, nurse, and above all,, caring for the best Interest of her children, more than you, or I, the paternal family, the child Protection Svce., and obviously Boston Hospital too..
It also comes with another price, and it's the lives of those individuals really in need of the Child Protection svce.,, that are tying up the time and funds to be in court, pay the foster care providers, just the paper work alone is costly.
THE MOTIVE BEHIND THIS DEPT. of child protective svce. IS THE GOVT. TITLE IV INCENTIVE FUNDS GRANTED THEM, but the conditions for them to receive these bonus funds stipulate that they have to have had increased the number of children from the prior year. THEY ALSO GET SPECIAL PERKS FOR THOSE KIDS THEY ADOPT OUT. With the Routh case, they got a double header: the medicaid funds no longer paid to Boston, would return to Texas; and these INCENTIVE GRANTS, that COME OUT OF OUR SENIOR CITIZENS SOCIAL SECURITY FUND, that's why it's broke/DRAINED. This is going on nationwide, with Florida and Texas in the lead for having raked in the most OF THOSE incentive funds, totaling in the hundreds of millions.
The following are just "some" I'd like to point out of the "on-going", besides the facts that the Routh children have been illegally taken into CPS custody, they continue to:
1. Denial of medical records and information (example-Dalton/Emma appointments, treatments, outcomes, drugs like Clonidine).
2. CPS's demand that Brandy see their contracted counselor even though she has one and will pay for it herself. Multiple violations of CPS policies and ethics laws.
3. Denial of either Family Team Meeting (before removal) and Family Group Conference (after removal).
4. Visitations are in a hostile environment and too infrequent for such a young child (Dalton) and for a medically fragile child (Emma) because of the stress the separation is causing especially relating to Emma's recovery.
5. Homeschooling was vehemently attacked by DFPS and now that Emma is in public school she's being exposed to a host germ. Furthermore, Dalton has NOT received his speech therapies that the mother Brandy was performing with both at home. {Might it be noted the child Dalton is #3 yrs. of age-technically ,he's not even met legal school age requirements. How could she be penalized for something she's not even required, by law, to do yet}..
6. EMMA'S MEDICAL CONDITION!! Most important and paramount. Emma is probably rejecting her transplant at least in part due to the cessation of all the sterile precautions. CPS denied this information to the mother and (even to the judge). The caregiver also informed Brandy that Amy was no longer giving Emma the anti-rejection drugs. Mother has no way of knowing (since she's denied medical records) who is making the call and why. EMMA COULD DIE AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THIS PROTECTION INTERVENTION (removal) and the department's lack of following even the most basic policies and procedures that codified in the law.
^^There is also the on-going violations of rights, that the dept. of CPS has continued abuse of making decisions, without the Judges knowledge, of meetings, and decisions being made, without approval by Judge; not permitting the lawyers to attend or be informed of those meetings, nor decisions that were made regarding the children.^^
Respectfully,
U.S. CITIZENS OF AMERICA
JUDGE PAMELA FOSTER FLETCHER GAVE EXPLICIT ORDERS TO ALL PARTIES {MOTHER, BRANDY; FATHER CLINT; GRANDMOTHER LISA ROUTH; CHILD PROTECTION SVCE. FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS..NOBODY WAS PERMITTED TO DO ANY FUNDRAISING; BENEFIT DRIVES; ETC.
NOTE: THERE IS A WALL POST IN PRAYERS FOR EMMA REGARDING A HOAX AND COMMENTS OF PEOPLE USING EMMA FOR MONETARY GAINS! THE ONLY ONE GUILTY OF DOING SO IS. THE ADMIN OF PRAYERS FOR EMMA {FOSTERCARE PROVIDER/AUNT-AMY} AND LISA ROUTH.
NOTE: THERE IS A WALL POST IN PRAYERS FOR EMMA REGARDING A HOAX AND COMMENTS OF PEOPLE USING EMMA FOR MONETARY GAINS! THE ONLY ONE GUILTY OF DOING SO IS. THE ADMIN OF PRAYERS FOR EMMA {FOSTERCARE PROVIDER/AUNT-AMY} AND LISA ROUTH.